Visi įrašai, pažymėti: "Pakistanas"
Islamas ir valstybės valdžios kūrimas
seyyed vali reza nasr
The Islamization of Pakistan
The Middle East Institute
Jordanijos musulmonų brolija ir Pakistano Jama'at-i-Islam
Neha Sahgal
Islamistinio aktyvizmo tyrimas yra socialinio judėjimo teorijos naujiena. Socialinio judėjimo stipendija ignoravo islamistinius judėjimus dėl jų unikalios tikėjimo prigimties. Visai neseniai mokslininkai pripažino, kad socialinio judėjimo teorijos konceptualizuoti ginčų procesai gali būti taikomi islamistiniam aktyvizmui, siekiant teorinių patobulinimų abiejose studijų srityse., I examine variations in the strategies followed by Islamistmovements in response to government policies. States have followed various policies inmanaging the tide of Islamist opposition to their power. Some states have chosen to userepressive means (Egiptas, Jordan before 1989), while others, at different times in theirhistory have used accommodative policies (Jordan after 1989, Pakistanas, Malaizija). Iexamine the effects of government accommodation on Islamist movement strategies.I argue that accommodation can have varying effects on Islamist movementstrategies depending on the nature of accommodative policies followed. Governmentshave employed two different types of accommodative policies in their tenuousrelationship with Islamist opposition – Islamization and liberalization. Islamizacija bando kooptuoti judėjimus per didesnį valstybės ir visuomenės religingumą. Liberalizacija leidžia judėjimams vykdyti savo veiklą tiek valstybės, tiek visuomenės lygmeniu, nebūtinai didinant valstybės religingumą1.. Islamizacija atima islamistams galių, o liberalizavimas suteikia jiems įtakos, suteikdamas įtakos.
Islamic Movements and the Use of Violence:
Esenas Kirdis
Despite recent academic and popular focus on violent transnational Islamic terrorist networks,there is a multiplicity of Islamic movements. This multiplicity presents scholars with two puzzles. The first puzzle is understanding why domestic-oriented Islamic movements that were formed as a reaction to the establishment of secular nation-states shifted their activities and targets onto a multi-layered transnational space. The second puzzle is understanding why groups with similar aims and targets adopt different strategies of using violence or nonviolence when they “go transnational.” The two main questions that this paper will address are: Why do Islamic movements go transnational? And, why do they take on different forms when they transnationalize? First, I argue that the transnational level presents a new political venue for Islamic movements which are limited in their claim making at the domestic level. Second, I argue that transnationalization creates uncertainty for groups about their identity and claims at the transnational level. The medium adopted, i.e. use of violence versus non-violence, is dependent on type of transnationalization, the actors encounter at the transnational level, and leadership’s interpretations on where the movement should go next. To answer my questions, I will look at four cases: (1) Turkish Islam, (2) the Muslim Brotherhood, (3) Jemaah Islamiyah, ir (4) Tablighi Jamaat