Alle Einträge Tagged With: "Ayman Nour"
Leben mit Demokratie in Ägypten
Daniel Tröster
Hosni Mubarek wurde im September fast zum Präsidenten Ägyptens gewählt 2005. Nicht dass der siebenundsiebzigjährige säkulare Autokrat, der diese Nation in den letzten vierundzwanzig Jahren regiert hat, die Wahl verloren hätte; von der offiziellen Zählung, er nahm fast 85 Prozent der Stimmen. Sein nächster Konkurrent, Ayman Nour, der Emporkömmling der jungen Oppositionspartei al-Ghad ("Morgen"),schaffte weniger als 8 Prozent. Der einzige andere Kandidat, der eine signifikante Bilanz ziehen konnte, war der alte NomanGamaa des ehrwürdigen al-Wafd ("Delegation")Party, wer schaffte weniger als 3 Prozent. Die Ikhwanal-Muslimeen ("Muslimbruderschaft"), Von einigen Westlern für seine puristische islamische soziale und politische Agenda gefürchtet, Ich habe nicht einmal einen Kandidaten aufgestellt. Mubareks entscheidender Sieg scheint für die meisten Menschen - insbesondere für säkulare Amerikaner - beruhigend zu sein, die sich Sorgen um die Zukunft der wenigen westlichen Freunde machen,gemäßigte arabische Regime, bedroht durch die Islamisierung der Politik in der Region. Auch die Bush-Regierung scheint sich darüber gefreut zu haben, angesichts der jüngsten Änderung des Herzens in Bezug auf die arabische Demokratie. Die fehlenden chemischen Waffen im Irak und die anschließende Rechtfertigung des Krieges als Präzedenzfall für die Demokratisierung haben das Weiße Haus dazu inspiriert, auf so viele Wahlen wie möglich in der Region zu drängen. Tatsächlich, als Außenministerin Condoleezza Rice im Juni an der American University in Cairo sprach, Sie kündigte zu einiger Überraschung an, dass die Vereinigten Staaten "seit sechzig Jahren" sich in "Verfolgung" geirrt hätten[ing] Stabilität auf Kosten der Demokratie “im Nahen Osten. Für Generationen, US-. Experten waren sich sicher, dass der "arabischen Straße" die Abstimmung nicht anvertraut werden konnte, wie sie die Macht an Kommunisten oder fundamentalistische Islamisten übergeben könnten. Die Realpolitik diktierte, dass Autokraten und Diktatoren, wie Mubarek und Saddam Hussein, musste verhätschelt werden, um die „Stabilität“ in der Region aufrechtzuerhalten. Wenn sie dann Wahlen veranstalten würden, würden sie ganz auf sie verzichten, Redefreiheit verweigern,und lassen Sie die Geheimpolizei los, um die Bevölkerung zu terrorisieren,Das Weiße Haus würde wahrscheinlich ein Auge zudrücken. Aber wenn Mubarek jetzt ein echtes demokratisches Mandat beanspruchen könnte,das wäre das Beste von allen Welten.
Ein Ruf nach Gerechtigkeit
Ibrahim El Houdaiby
Kommentar: Hollow-Ring für Demokratie
Arnaud de Borchgrave
WASHINGTON, June 24 (UPI) — The White House’s crusade for democracy, as President Bush sees it, has produced “a critical mass of events taking that (Mittlerer Osten) region in a hopeful new direction.” And Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice just toured the area, making clear at every stop whenever the United States has a choice between stability and democracy, the new ideological remedy would sacrifice stability.
Veteran Mideast hands who have dealt with five regional wars and two intifadas over the past half century shuddered. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger first among them.
“For the U.S. to crusade in every part of the world to spread democracy may be beyond our capacity,” he says. die US-. system, he explains, “is the product of unique historical experiences, difficult to duplicate or to transplant into Muslim societies where secular democracy has seldom thrived.” If ever.
If stability had been sacrificed for democracy, the former national security adviser and secretary of State to Presidents Nixon and Ford could not have negotiated major Arab-Israeli disengagement agreements: Sinai I, Golan and Sinai II. Without the undemocratic, benign dictatorial figure of Anwar Sadat at the helm in Egypt, or without the late Syrian dictator and master terror-broker Hafez Assad, yet another page of war history would have been written.
With a democratic parliament in Egypt in 1974, presumably dominated by the popular Muslim Brotherhood, Sadat could not have made his spectacular, death-defying trip to Jerusalem — and suddenly become the most popular leader in Israel. A peace treaty between Egypt and Israel and between Jordan and Israel were possible only because absolute rulers — Sadat and the late King Hussein, led both Arab countries.
Sadat knew his courageous act of statesmanship was tantamount to signing his own death warrant. It was carried out in 1981 — by Islamist extremists — on worldwide television.
Rice proudly proclaims it is no longer a war against terrorism but a struggle for democracy. She is proud the Bush administration no longer pursues stability at the expense of democracy. But already the democracy crusade is not only encountering speed bumps, but also roadblocks on a road to nowhere.
The much-vaunted Palestinian elections scheduled for July have been postponed indefinitely.
Im Libanon, the ballot box has already been nullified by political machinations. Gen. Michael Aoun, a bright but aging prospect who came back from French exile to take on Syria’s underground machine, has already joined forces with Damascus. While denying any deal with Syria, the general’s henchmen concede he was compensated munificently for his retirement years in Paris from his post as army chief of staff and his time as premier. Aoun collected $22 million, which included compound interest.
In Ägypten, Rice, presumably attempting to confer respectability on President Hosni Mubarak’s challengers, took time out to receive a known political charlatan who has over the years been exposed as someone who forged election results as he climbed the ladder of a number of political parties under a variety of labels.
Even Mubarak’s enemies concede Ayman Nour fabricated and forged the signatures of as many as 1,187 citizens to conform to regulations to legalize his Ghad (Tomorrow) Party. His career is dotted with phony academic credentials, plagiarism, a staged assassination attempt on himself, charges of embezzlement by his Saudi media employer, and scads of document forgeries.
Rice had canceled a previous trip to Egypt to protest the indictment and jailing of Nour pending trial. And before Rice’s most recent accolade, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright had also gone out of her way to praise Egypt’s master political con man. Makes you wonder what kind of political reporting is coming out of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo.
With this double-headed endorsement by the United States, Nour is losing what little favor he still has in Egypt. He is now seen as a U.S. stooge, to add to a long list of failings.
Die Muslimbruderschaft, which is outlawed but tolerated since it renounced terrorism, is more representative of Egyptian opinion than Nour. There is also the Kifaya (Enough) movement that groups Egypt’s leading intellectuals. But they declined to meet with Rice.
The United States is seen throughout the Arab world as synonymous with Israel. This automatically limits the Bush administration’s ability to win friends and influence people. Those making the most out of U.S. pressure to democratize are organizations listed by the United States as “terrorist.” Both Hamas in the Palestinian territories and Hezbollah in Lebanon are now mining opportunities both above and underground. Islamic legislators in Jordan petitioned King Abdullah to allow Jordanian Hamas leaders, evicted six years ago, to come home. The king listened impassively.
It took Europe 500 years to reach the degree of political maturity witnessed by the recent collapse of the European Union’s plans for a common constitution. Winston Churchill said democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. But Churchill also said, “The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” This still applies in the souks of the Arab world, from Marrakech to Muscat.