Все записи в "Турция" Категория
ISLAM, DEMOCRACY & THE USA:
Cordoba Foundation
Абдулла Faliq
Intro ,
Исламская политическая культура, Демократия, и права человека
Даниэль E. Цена
PRECISION IN THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR:
Sherifa Зухур
EGYPT’S MUSLIM BROTHERS: CONFRONTATION OR INTEGRATION?
Research
Ислам и демократия: Text, Tradition, and History
Ахрар Ахмад
GLOBALIZATION AND POLITICAL ISLAM: THE SOCIAL BASES OF TURKEY’S WELFARE PARTY
Халдун Gulalp
A Muslim Archipelago
Макс L. Брутто
Democracy in Islamic Political Thought
Аззам S. Тамими
Исламская политическая культура, Демократия, и права человека
Даниэль E. Цена
Исламистские оппозиционные партии и потенциал взаимодействия с ЕС
Тоби Арчер
Хайди Huuhtanen
Political Islam in the Middle East
Есть Кнудсена
СТРАТЕГИИ ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОГО ИСЛАМА
ШАДИ ХАМИД
AMANDA Kadlec
исламистские Стороны : participation without power
Malika Zeghal
Решение исламистских Америки Дилемма: Уроки из стран Южной и Юго-Восточной Азии
Исламистские движения и демократического процесса в арабском мире: Изучение серых зон
Натан J. Коричневый, Амр Hamzawy,
Марина Оттауэй
Исламистских Радикализация
Issues relating to political Islam continue to present challenges to European foreign policies in the Middle East and North Africa (БВСА). As EU policy has sought to come to terms with such challenges during the last decade or so political Islam itself has evolved. Experts point to the growing complexity and variety of trends within political Islam. Some Islamist organisations have strengthened their commitment to democratic norms and engaged fully in peaceable, mainstream national politics. Others remain wedded to violent means. And still others have drifted towards a more quietist form of Islam, disengaged from political activity. Political Islam in the MENA region presents no uniform trend to European policymakers. Analytical debate has grown around the concept of ‘radicalisation’. This in turn has spawned research on the factors driving ‘de-radicalisation’, and conversely, ‘re-radicalisation’. Much of the complexity derives from the widely held view that all three of these phenomena are occurring at the same time. Even the terms themselves are contested. It has often been pointed out that the moderate–radical dichotomy fails fully to capture the nuances of trends within political Islam. Some analysts also complain that talk of ‘radicalism’ is ideologically loaded. At the level of terminology, we understand radicalisation to be associated with extremism, but views differ over the centrality of its religious–fundamentalist versus political content, and over whether the willingness to resort to violence is implied or not.
Such differences are reflected in the views held by the Islamists themselves, as well as in the perceptions of outsiders.