Challenging Authoritarianism, Kolonialisme, and Disunity: The Islamic Political Reform Movements of al-Afghani and Rida

| Sep 02, 2010 | Kommentarer 0

Ahmed Ali Salem

The decline of the Muslim world preceded European colonization of most

Muslim lands in the last quarter of the nineteenth century and the first

quarter of the twentieth century. I særdeleshed, the Ottoman Empire’s

power and world status had been deteriorating since the seventeenth century.

But, more important for Muslim scholars, it had ceased to meet

some basic requirements of its position as the caliphate, the supreme and

sovereign political entity to which all Muslims should be loyal.

Derfor, some of the empire’s Muslim scholars and intellectuals called

for political reform even before the European encroachment upon

Muslim lands. The reforms that they envisaged were not only Islamic, men

also Ottomanic – from within the Ottoman framework.

These reformers perceived the decline of the Muslim world in general,

and of the Ottoman Empire in particular, to be the result of an increasing

disregard for implementing the Shari`ah (islamisk lov). Imidlertid, since the

late eighteenth century, an increasing number of reformers, sometimes supported

by the Ottoman sultans, began to call for reforming the empire along

modern European lines. The empire’s failure to defend its lands and to

respond successfully to the West’s challenges only further fueled this call

for “modernizing” reform, which reached its peak in the Tanzimat movement

in the second half of the nineteenth century.

Other Muslim reformers called for a middle course. På den ene side,

de indrømmede, at kalifatet skulle modelleres efter det islamiske

kilder til vejledning, især Koranen og profeten Muhammeds

lære (Sunnah), og at ummah's (verdens muslimske samfund)

enhed er en af islams politiske grundpiller. På den anden side, de indså

behov for at forynge imperiet eller erstatte det med et mere levedygtigt. Ja,

deres kreative ideer om fremtidige modeller inkluderet, men var ikke begrænset til, det

følge: erstatte det tyrkisk ledede osmanniske rige med et arabisk ledet

kalifat, opbygning af et føderalt eller konfødereret muslimsk kalifat, etablering

et samvelde af muslimske eller orientalske nationer, og styrkelse af solidariteten

og samarbejde mellem uafhængige muslimske lande uden at skabe

en fast struktur. Disse og lignende ideer blev senere omtalt som

Muslimsk ligamodel, which was an umbrella thesis for the various proposals

related to the future caliphate.

Two advocates of such reform were Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and

Muhammad `Abduh, both of whom played key roles in the modern

Islamic political reform movement.1 Their response to the dual challenge

facing the Muslim world in the late nineteenth century – European colonization

and Muslim decline – was balanced. Their ultimate goal was to

revive the ummah by observing the Islamic revelation and benefiting

from Europe’s achievements. Imidlertid, they disagreed on certain aspects

and methods, as well as the immediate goals and strategies, of reform.

While al-Afghani called and struggled mainly for political reform,

`Abduh, once one of his close disciples, developed his own ideas, which

emphasized education and undermined politics.

ZD Scribd iPaper

Arkiveret under: Algeriet • Egypten • Fremhævet • Jordan • Libanon • Marokko • muslimsk Broderskab • Palæstina • Undersøgelser & Undersøgelser • Syrien