Wszystkie wpisy w "Indyk" Kategoria
ISLAM, DEMOKRACJA & USA:
Fundacja Kordoby
Abdullah Faliq |
Wprowadzenie ,
Islamska kultura polityczna, Demokracja, i prawa człowieka
Daniele. Cena £
PRECYZJA W GLOBALNEJ WOJNIE Z TERROREM:
Szeryfa Zuhur
MUZUŁMAŃSCY BRACIA EGIPTU: KONFRONTACJA CZY INTEGRACJA?
Research
Islam i demokracja: Tekst, Tradycja, i historia
Ahrar Ahmad
GLOBALIZACJA I ISLAM POLITYCZNY: PODSTAWY SPOŁECZNE TURCJI OPIEKI SPOŁECZNEJ
Haldun Gulalp
Archipelag muzułmański
Maks. L. Brutto
Demokracja w islamskiej myśli politycznej
Azzam S. Tamimi
Islamska kultura polityczna, Demokracja, i prawa człowieka
Daniele. Cena £
Islamskie partie opozycyjne i potencjał zaangażowania UE
Toby Archer
Heidi Huuhtanen
Islam polityczny na Bliskim Wschodzie
Czy Knudsen
STRATEGIE ANGAŻOWANIA ISLAMÓW POLITYCZNYCH
SHADI HAMID
AMANDA KADLEC
Partie Islamskie : uczestnictwo bez władzy
Malika Zeghal
Rozwiązanie islamistycznego dylematu Ameryki: Lekcje z Azji Południowej i Południowo-Wschodniej
RUCHY ISLAMISTÓW A PROCES DEMOKRATYCZNY W ŚWIECIE ARABSKIM: Odkrywanie szarych stref
Nathan J. brązowy, Amr Hamzawy,
Marina Ottaway
RADYKALIZACJA ISLAMISTÓW
Issues relating to political Islam continue to present challenges to European foreign policies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). As EU policy has sought to come to terms with such challenges during the last decade or so political Islam itself has evolved. Experts point to the growing complexity and variety of trends within political Islam. Some Islamist organisations have strengthened their commitment to democratic norms and engaged fully in peaceable, mainstream national politics. Others remain wedded to violent means. And still others have drifted towards a more quietist form of Islam, disengaged from political activity. Political Islam in the MENA region presents no uniform trend to European policymakers. Analytical debate has grown around the concept of ‘radicalisation’. This in turn has spawned research on the factors driving ‘de-radicalisation’, and conversely, ‘re-radicalisation’. Much of the complexity derives from the widely held view that all three of these phenomena are occurring at the same time. Even the terms themselves are contested. It has often been pointed out that the moderate–radical dichotomy fails fully to capture the nuances of trends within political Islam. Some analysts also complain that talk of ‘radicalism’ is ideologically loaded. At the level of terminology, we understand radicalisation to be associated with extremism, but views differ over the centrality of its religious–fundamentalist versus political content, and over whether the willingness to resort to violence is implied or not.
Such differences are reflected in the views held by the Islamists themselves, as well as in the perceptions of outsiders.