모든 항목 "요르단 MB" 범주
이슬람교, 정치적 이슬람과 미국
아랍 통찰력
미국과의 "형제 관계"가 가능한가?
칼릴 알 아나니
이슬람주의의 재발견
마하 아잠
이슬람과 민주주의
ITAC
이슬람 정치 문화, 민주주의, 및 인권
다니엘. 가격
이슬람 정치 문화, 민주주의, 및 인권
다니엘. 가격
중동의 정치적 이슬람
Are Knudsen
정치적 이슬람 참여를 위한 전략
SHADI HAMID
AMANDA KADLEC
이슬람 정당 : 세 종류의 움직임
타마라 코프만
이슬람 정당 : 민주주의에 대한 이익 또는 해로움?
Amr Hamzawy
나단 J. 갈색
아랍 세계의 이슬람 운동과 민주주의 과정: 회색 영역 탐색
나단 J. 갈색, Amr Hamzawy,
마리나 오타 웨이
이슬람 급진화
Issues relating to political Islam continue to present challenges to European foreign policies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). As EU policy has sought to come to terms with such challenges during the last decade or so political Islam itself has evolved. Experts point to the growing complexity and variety of trends within political Islam. Some Islamist organisations have strengthened their commitment to democratic norms and engaged fully in peaceable, mainstream national politics. Others remain wedded to violent means. And still others have drifted towards a more quietist form of Islam, disengaged from political activity. Political Islam in the MENA region presents no uniform trend to European policymakers. Analytical debate has grown around the concept of ‘radicalisation’. This in turn has spawned research on the factors driving ‘de-radicalisation’, and conversely, ‘re-radicalisation’. Much of the complexity derives from the widely held view that all three of these phenomena are occurring at the same time. Even the terms themselves are contested. It has often been pointed out that the moderate–radical dichotomy fails fully to capture the nuances of trends within political Islam. Some analysts also complain that talk of ‘radicalism’ is ideologically loaded. At the level of terminology, we understand radicalisation to be associated with extremism, but views differ over the centrality of its religious–fundamentalist versus political content, and over whether the willingness to resort to violence is implied or not.
Such differences are reflected in the views held by the Islamists themselves, as well as in the perceptions of outsiders.
이슬람교, 이슬람교도, 그리고 중동의 선거 원칙
제임스 피스 카토리
정치적 이슬람과 유럽 외교
POLITICAL ISLAM AND THE EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD POLICY
MICHAEL EMERSON
RICHARD YOUNGS
Since 2001 and the international events that ensued the nature of the relationship between the West and political Islam has become a definingissue for foreign policy. In recent years a considerable amount of research and analysis has been undertaken on the issue of political Islam. This has helped to correct some of the simplistic and alarmist assumptions previously held in the West about the nature of Islamist values and intentions. Parallel to this, the European Union (EU) has developed a number of policy initiatives primarily the European Neighbourhood Policy(ENP) that in principle commit to dialogue and deeper engagement all(non-violent) political actors and civil society organisations within Arab countries. Yet many analysts and policy-makers now complain of a certain a trophy in both conceptual debate and policy development. It has been established that political Islam is a changing landscape, deeply affected bya range of circumstances, but debate often seems to have stuck on the simplistic question of ‘are Islamists democratic?’ Many independent analysts have nevertheless advocated engagement with Islamists, but theactual rapprochement between Western governments and Islamist organisations remains limited .
온건한 무슬림 형제단
로버트 S. 레이 켄
스티븐 브룩
이슬람 운동의 관리: 살라피스, 무슬림 형제단, 요르단의 국가 권력
파이살 고리
유권자들이 권위주의 하에서 반대파를 지지하도록 이끄는 이유 ?
마이클 D.H. 로빈스